Tim Stutts from PushPopDesign wrote a very apt post titled “Who works with creative coders?“, analyzing the responsibilities of what’s assumed to be creative coders and listing a bunch of (great) companies in the process. Choice quote:
The world is also no longer flat, but fully 3D, immersive, augmented, to the point where traditional design planning deliverables are no longer able to do it full justice. Furthermore, companies are beginning to recognize that a work-flow where designers strictly design and developers strictly develop, though resulting in stable, requirement-driven software, is prohibitive to the kinds of synaptic leaps and bounds that can happen in the minds of talented individuals who are given the freedom to move back and forth through designing and coding to see a concept to completion. It can no longer be ignored that today the ideas resulting from â€˜creative codingâ€™ explorations arenâ€™t just ending up as side projects on company sites, but making their way into actual applications, websites, commercials and physical products of top design and technology players in the industry.
To which I fully agree, despite the fear of creating a new ridiculous title that becomes devoid of meaning (like “Guru”, “Ninja”, or “Rockstar”).
var in Java), something more importantly has remained: the knowledge on how to build great user experiences, and on how to learn and find solutions to problems. At least in part of the industry, being flexible and agile in learning, experimenting, and finding solutions to problems is more important than accumulated knowledge of a very particular platform. And that takes a creative mind – something that everyone is prepared to have, but demands practice lest it’ll bring atrophy to the serendipity muscles.