<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picnik now supporting Pixel Bender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zehfernando.com/2008/picnik-now-supporting-pixel-bender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zehfernando.com/2008/picnik-now-supporting-pixel-bender/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Picnik and Flash &#124; Ryan Stewart &#8211; Rich Internet Application Mountaineer</title>
		<link>http://zehfernando.com/2008/picnik-now-supporting-pixel-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Picnik and Flash &#124; Ryan Stewart &#8211; Rich Internet Application Mountaineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zehfernando.com/?p=243#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>[...] Part of it is the initial investment, but one of the things I think is telling is that the Picnik guys never switched away from Flash. They had the basic start in Flash Player 8, built it on (I believe) Flash Player 9 which gave them the performance improvements they wanted, and they even moved to Flash Player 10 pretty quickly to get better file upload support as well as make heavy use of Pixel Bender. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part of it is the initial investment, but one of the things I think is telling is that the Picnik guys never switched away from Flash. They had the basic start in Flash Player 8, built it on (I believe) Flash Player 9 which gave them the performance improvements they wanted, and they even moved to Flash Player 10 pretty quickly to get better file upload support as well as make heavy use of Pixel Bender. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeh Fernando &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flash Player penetration statistics for september 2009</title>
		<link>http://zehfernando.com/2008/picnik-now-supporting-pixel-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeh Fernando &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flash Player penetration statistics for september 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zehfernando.com/?p=243#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>[...] One year ago, in October 2008, Flash Player 10 was released. At the time, due to some major early adoption, I predicted it&#8217;d reach a 90% browser penetration after 6 months. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One year ago, in October 2008, Flash Player 10 was released. At the time, due to some major early adoption, I predicted it&#8217;d reach a 90% browser penetration after 6 months. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeh Fernando &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flash penetration statistics updated, and some context</title>
		<link>http://zehfernando.com/2008/picnik-now-supporting-pixel-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeh Fernando &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flash penetration statistics updated, and some context</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zehfernando.com/?p=243#comment-734</guid>
		<description>[...] actually quite surprised that my own prediction of a 90% in 6 months for Flash 10 - previously it would take one year for Flash to reach that mark - seems more realistic now. That, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] actually quite surprised that my own prediction of a 90% in 6 months for Flash 10 &#8211; previously it would take one year for Flash to reach that mark &#8211; seems more realistic now. That, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
